Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Sulfonamide Derivatives of 2-Amino-1-phenylethane as Suitable Cholinesterase Inhibitors

Muhammad A Abbasi1 , Sagheer Ahmad1, Aziz-ur-Rehman1, Shahid Rasool1, Khalid M Khan2, Muhammad Ashraf3, Rumana Nasar3, Tayaba Ismail3

1Department of Chemistry, Government College University, Lahore-54000; 2HEJ Research Institute of Chemistry, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270; 3Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology; The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan.

For correspondence:-  Muhammad Abbasi   Email: atrabbasi@yahoo.com   Tel:+9242111000010

Received: 6 September 2013        Accepted: 19 March 2014        Published: 23 May 2014

Citation: Abbasi MA, Ahmad S, Aziz-ur-Rehman , Rasool S, Khan KM, Ashraf M, et al. Sulfonamide Derivatives of 2-Amino-1-phenylethane as Suitable Cholinesterase Inhibitors. Trop J Pharm Res 2014; 13(5):739-745 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v13i5.13

© 2014 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the enzyme inhibition activity of N-substituted sulfamoyl derivatives of 2-amino-1-phenylethane as probable new drug candidates for the treatment of Alzheimer’s diseases.
Methods: A series of sulfamoyl derivatives, 3a-l, of 1-amino-2-phenylethane (1) were synthesized by reacting with various aryl sulfonyl chlorides, 2a-l, in the presence of aqueous Na2CO3 solution under definite pH control. All the synthesized molecules were screened against three enzymes, acetyl cholinesterase (AChE), butyryl cholinesterase (BChE) and lipoxygenase (LOX). The synthesized derivatives were further characterized by infra-red spectroscopy (IR), nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) and electron ionization–mass spectrometry (EI-MS) for structure elucidation.
Results: Screening against acetyl cholinesterase (AChE), butyryl cholinesterase (BChE) and lipoxygenase (LOX) showed these molecules to be suitable inhibitors of cholinesterase enzymes, AChE and BChE, relative to eserine, the reference standard. The molecule, 3c, remained effective with 50 % inhibitory concentration (IC50)  value of 82.93 ± 0.15 µM (relative to eserine with IC50 value of 0.04 ± 0.0001 µM) against AChE; similarly 3d was active against BChE with IC50 value of 45.65 ± 0.48 µM compared to eserine with IC50 value of 0.85 ± 0.00 µM. The molecule, 3f, was inactive against all the three enzymes.
Conclusion: Overall, the results indicate that these compounds are active against cholinesterase enzymes but less potent against lipoxygenase enzyme.

Keywords: 1-Amino-2-phenylethane, Aryl sulfonyl chlorides, Cholinesterase enzymes, Lipoxygenase

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates